Thesis Writing & Publishing I-- Seminar--Lulu's Presentation (1-12-2011)

Position: 徐碧霙 > 英語教學 > 論文寫作與發表 I (FALL 2010)

by 徐碧霙

2011-01-12 14:13:20, Reply(17), Views(1441)

Reply(17)

(1 , 林珈儀

, 2011-01-12 15:41:07)

Lulu

Strength:

．Dress-code

．Confidence

．Good pronunciation

．Taking some examples to explain is good.

Weakness:

．The handout of slide 7 & 9 are not clear.

Question:

．In this paper, the participants are too young to do the test. How do you think if selecting the older participants? It would be much better outcomes than this paper, huh?

(2 , 任珩

, 2011-01-13 18:07:48)

Strength

Pretty and HOT today… and recall my memory that the first time we met in the classroom for the interview!! Haha…

Perfect pronunciation just like native speaker!! COOL!!

Beautiful slide background on slide 8, 10.

Clear explanation for slide 11, 12, 14.

Dudu is so cute!!

Weakness

I want to see the Bangers and Mash online, not the picture only!! Hehe~~

Question

As what I mentioned in the class, the post test is exactly same, so that there must be obvious threat of internal validity in the methodology. How do you think?

(3 , 簡依萍

, 2011-01-13 19:49:00)

Comments for Lulu’s Presentation
Strength	1. Fluent performance. 2. Fancy ppt design. 3. Fabulous suit. 4. Full-prepared when answering the questions from the listener.
Weakness	1. Words are covered in slide 2. 2. The line between the charts is a noticeable slant in slide 12. 3. The words in the left part of the table of the slide 23 are not neat.
Question	The result shows that the reading score of intervention group is lower than the control group. Does it indicate that if we want to enhance little kids’ reading ability, a story book is better than talking book?

(4 , 蔡宜臻

, 2011-01-14 18:42:39)

Strength:

Your voice so sweet just like your person~~ And great pronunciation! I totally want to hear you speaking French, BABY~~

Weakness:

For your handout, slide 9 was not so clear and slide 17 can not been seen at all...

Question:

I still can't understand why there's such a big difference between the 2 groups with 15 and 60 people to start with?? Why not pick the 15 from the 60 from the get-go??

(5 , 黃昱崧

, 2011-01-14 20:10:44)

For Lulu!!

Strength: 1. Good pronunciation(so sweet)

2. Interesting topic

Weakness: 1. Forget to attach Dudu's voice file.

2. It would be better to have more eye contact

Question: In stead of CAL system, in your opinion, what's method will you use

for the young kids?

(6 , 吳宜庭

, 2011-01-15 15:44:35)

Lulu

Strength

clear explanation

charming voice~ I love your pronunciation!!!!

beautiful ppt design

Weakness

Some slides in handout can not be seen totally, like slide 1,7,9,15.

Next time, you can take DuDu to the class!!!!!!!!

Question

In your point of view, children were too young to understand the rules of CAL, and how do you solve this problem or do you have any ideas about using CAL for childern except the age of the children?

(7 , 林翠鈺

, 2011-01-15 16:36:30)

Presenter	Lulu
Strength	Your voice is beautiful, and has very rich and colorful PPT design.
Weakness	You may need to speak up a little bit.
Question	On slide 14 the participants were given the post-test 4 weeks later after the pre-test, so were the participants given any practice material or activity to learn the vocabulary, or only had the control material and the talking bood?

(8 , 潘暄穎

, 2011-01-15 21:46:43)

Strength

Good PPT design

Many examples to explain the topic

Weakness

The speed is a little bit fast

Question

If you are the researcher, how do you expand the participant?

(9 , 羅正皓

, 2011-01-16 03:13:36)

Lulu

Strength:

- Very interesting topic

- Excellent speaking skills; clear, fluent and confident

- Beautiful slides illustrations and explanations

Weakness:

- It’s a pity that some slides are printed unclearly.

Question:

- The numbers of participants between these two groups are extremely uneven. If they were even, do you think the results would have been less significant?

(10 , 趙宜芳

, 2011-01-16 03:22:28)

Presenters	Lulu
Strength	Good pronunciation Confident In slide 5, use examples and underline the important words Explain what is British ability scales word reading assessment
Weakness	Louder will be better Cannot see the slide 7 on the handout
Question	In slide 12 it shows that the age is 3-6 years old, in your opinion, do you think that those students will too young to concentrate on the soft ware for a long time?

(11 , 李沛倫

, 2011-01-16 12:30:29)

Comments for Lulu
Strength	1. good Dress code 2. good pronunciation 3. highline the terms
Weakness	1. need to speed up 2. in slide 2, should have the space before 33-35
Question	1. Why did the reading score of the experimental group lower than the control group?

(12 , ALICE, 2011-01-16 23:17:56)

Presenters	LULU
Strength	Great ppt background design You looks so pretty today! Very clear presentation. I like your intonation and pronunciation.
Weakness	Everything is great except time control^_^
Question	The participants’ age are 3-6, do you think the age average are too young to survey?

(13 , Teresa, 2011-01-16 23:38:28)

Allen???

(14 , 賴思惠

, 2011-01-17 08:52:06)

Lulu

Strength:

1. ppt well-designed

2. good pronunciation and fluently

Weakness:

forgot to record the dog's singing

Question:

How do you extend the amount of the participants ?

(15 , 張祿倢, 2011-01-19 14:34:44)

To abi:

yes, older children will be better, the researcher pointed out that there were already many studies used older children to test on, so this researcher select young kids to make the research different from others.

To mindy:

With the same test, the researcher can observe how well did kids improve. Yes, there might be validity threats, but i think maybe the children might not remember what did they do previously. would it be possible too??

To 大姊:

We shouldn't that computer-aided learning won't help kids to improve reading ability. it's just "this" CAL material in this reseach is tested out to be less helpful in reading ability. there are some other CAL material is suitable to enhance little kids reading ability.

To Alison:

there are 15 kids in the control group, and 60 in the experimental group. which means these 60 kids can all play on the computer, and after 4 weeks, they pick 15 kids out of the 60 kids which match to these 15 kids in the control group. and these 15:15 are all in the same age, same level.

(16 , 張祿倢, 2011-01-19 14:52:07)

To Peter:

For my future kids, I will …… hmm.. it’s a tough question.. maybe just let them grow naturally, and do nothing instead. But I think reading bed time story is a good idea to improve children’s awareness.

To Catherine:

While explaining the rules, we have to make sure every child understand. If it’s too complicated, teacher could show the steps by play the computer game once or twice and let children have more pictures in their mind.

To Trista:

Yes, there are only the computer material and the story book, nothing else.

To Livia:

To expand the participants, it will matter to the class that I have. If I have more classes, I could expand the participants, if not, the minimum is 30 in total.

To Clement:

The participants to compare are even. 15:15.

(17 , 張祿倢, 2011-01-19 15:00:01)

To Emily:

Good point, I think children are concentrate when playing computers..XD

To Allen:

The reason is, this CAL material only focuses on the awareness.

To Alice:

Yes, the participants are too young. So there are some internal validity.

To Eunice:

I think to gather more students is a good idea.