To Andrew: I have learned a presentation skill from you a lot. Especially the delivery skill and the presentation procedure, they are quiet clear and organized and easy to understand.

As for the suggestion part, I think your voice is low and unclear and speedy. It’s better for you to slow down and present word by word.

My Question is about the topic: The effects of TPR by storytelling ...in a selected high school. Do you think it works to High School students? Is it has the remarkable difference compared with the participants who are from elementary school students? Cause we usually use TPR strategy in elementary school.

To Jenny: You still keep the no.1 presenter. The pictures you shown to us are helpful to understand the whole topic and make impressions as well.

As for the suggestion part: None. (ha~)

My Question is that how many questionnaires does the researcher get? In pre-test is 50 Korean adult visitors? Because in the world culture heritage, there must come from many countries, what are their backgrounds during the formal survey? Do you think background for the personal’s ethnic part is also a kind of affection element?

To Lynn: You did your presentation with good presentation delivery skills today. And the content is quiet organized. Also I am shock with your PowerPoint design.

My suggestion is that you can have more your-own-words to explain your topic items. Or, you can make an example to let the audience understand more clearly.

My question on this journal is about the result. In Table 1, the female has higher recommended rate compared with contribution rate. Does it mentioned why in this journal? Also, the male’s contribution rate is higher than the recommend part. Why they are opposite? I know the result is from the journal but does it mentioned in the journal that why the result is “surprising”. Or, can you try to use your thinking to tell me why? Thank you, little Lynn.

Dear Crystal,

You are NUMBER ONE evaluator!

I bet your classmates can learn a lot from your evaluation.

Also, your learning attitude DID impress me.

So happy to have  a highly-motivated student like you in class.

Teresa

Dear Sadia,

This is a neat table.

Teresa

To Crystal's question: According to the researcher, despite the fact that the perceptions of the male learners were positive than female, howerever, male didn't recommend this stretegy. It would be interesting to investigate the motivational factors and condition conductive to learner's willlingness to recommend cooperative learning in connection with the gender variable.

To Sadia's question: I am so sorry that I can't answer you what is the language art program because the researcher didn't metion this part.

To Paulinna question: If I were the researcher, I would let my reader know what the range of not only for low achievers, high achievers but also for intermediate achiever. Moreover, I would do the deeply interview to those students who provided a lot of contribution.

Thank you your suggestion and opinion. I will change those disadvantage.

Dear Lynn,

Appreciate your response.

You've been working hard.

Take care...

Teresa

Feedback and questions

To Andrew   well organized presentation, easy to follow

                    Colored phrases, such as slide no. 10, 11

                    Interesting process, such as slide no. 12, 13

To Lynn  briefly give the whole picture of this study

              clear slides, ie, no. 7,8,14,15

              enlarged handout is enjoyable for your readers

To Jenny    important points clearly displayed, for example, slides no. 14, 18, 27

Good presentation skills

Your pace is a little to fast to follow

That’s all for my comment.

Thank you guys for explaining and answering my questions!

1 Bodily-kinesthetic

2 Interpersonal

3 Verbal-linguistic

4 Logical-mathematical

5 Naturalistic

6 Intrapersonal

7 Visual-spatial

8 Musical

  漢明:

Here are the ejght main intelligencies I surveyed on wikipedia.

Please have a look, thanks.

To crystal's question:
This is a case study the researchers hoped it could give others some ideas of TPRS's effects
and the futher study will count on you, Crystal.

To Sadia's question:
The TPRS example is in my presentsted paper, p.5~p.7, of which the topic of the section  is Roles of the teacher in a TPRS classroom.
Hopefully useful for you.

To 曉薇's question:
The answer is yes. And during the process, you'd better balance ss' oral ability and ss' willingness to express themselves.

To 婉菁's question:
Not exactly. Readers should have a thurough concept of TPRS because every teacher might have their own way in this kind of class. Do the comparison with yours. Best wishes from andrew.

To Leya's question:
Students were randomly from the same class ,so they had almost the same ability. Then based on the research design, it showed us the difference between the two groups taught by various methods.