
How to Give a Successful Thesis Proposal Defense
*The thesis proposal defense should be a minimum of 20 minutes and a maximum of 30 minutes in length, so as to allow ample time for discussion within the one hour period. A rough breakdown of the time allotment should be as follows:
− Introduction (3 minutes)
− Review of Literature (5 minutes)
− Objectives (3 minutes)
− Methods (9 minutes)
Note:
The discussion of methods should take up close to one half of your presentation time. It is here that faculty will be able to provide you with constructive feedback, as well as judge your readiness to conduct the project.
*The oral presentation
- conciseness and clarity of the presentation
- correct language
- quality of the slides
- answering of the questions
- use of time
Criteria:
1. Will the proposed research problem, if successfully carried out, be a significant contribution to this area of knowledge, deserving of an M.S. degree?
2. Does the presentation give reasonable evidence that the student is familiar with significant literature in his/her field?
3. Are the proposed methods adequate to provide valid experimental data?
4. Will the proposed experimental design provide valid data applicable to the proposed research problem?
5. Are the proposed statistical procedures adequate to provide valid interpretation of experimental data?
6. Is the oral presentation clear and professional?
- conciseness and clarity of the presentation
- correct language
- quality of the slides
- answering of the questions
- use of time
Questions:
Comments/Suggestions
|
To
Criteria:
1. Will the proposed research problem, if successfully carried out, be a significant contribution to this area of knowledge, deserving of an M.S. degree?
Yes, the topic is corresponded to the current trend of multimedia teaching.
2. Does the presentation give reasonable evidence that the student is familiar with significant literature in his/her field?
Yes, the she offer a clear framework of literature review.
3. Are the proposed methods adequate to provide valid experimental data?
Yes, the presenter explained the methods step by step.
4. Will the proposed experimental design provide valid data applicable to the proposed research problem?
The presenter introduced the how she collect the data for answering the research questions, therefore I could easily get the sense of methodology.
5. Are the proposed statistical procedures adequate to provide valid interpretation of experimental data?
Yes, the presenter introduced how she will analyze the data in the future.
6. Is the oral presentation clear and professional?
Great job- conciseness and clarity of the presentation
No problem- correct language
Professional - quality of the slides
Good attitude- answering of the questions
3 Minutes left- use of time
Questions:
What are the interview questions of the study? Furthermore, how will you analyze qualitative data fir your research?
Comments & Suggestion:
Overall, this is an impressive presentation. I could see that you are so hard-working on your research.
1. Will the proposed research problem, if successfully carried out, be a significant contribution to this area of knowledge, deserving of an M.S. degree?
Since this is a difficult thesis at the beginning, you did it and conquered the problem. That’s good for you! I think this is a great method for students to acquire listen and reading abilities. If I’m of your class, I definitely attracted by this course. She clearly pointed out the problem of this research field. Moreover, I think it makes a significant contribution to teaching area.
2. Does the presentation give reasonable evidence that the student is familiar with significant literature in his/her field?
Surely, she shows a significant and updates literature of her field from slide 15 to 19.
3. Are the proposed methods adequate to provide valid experimental data?
The methods are good. She totally understands her research which presented in slide 21to 28. Therefore, the methods are adequate to provide valid experimental data.
4. Will the proposed experimental design provide valid data applicable to the proposed research problem?
Yes!
5. Are the proposed statistical procedures adequate to provide valid interpretation of experimental data?
I think yes. She demonstrates clearly statistical procedures which showed in slide 29 to 33.
6. Is the oral presentation clear and professional?
- conciseness and clarity of the presentation |
Great visual aids! The whole ppt desing are Excellent well organized for the procedure |
- correct language |
Smooth and fantastic voice quality |
- quality of the slides |
I appreciate slide 4, 13, 17, 18, 21,27 and31 because it provided a clearly explanation A colorful PPT background |
- answering of the questions |
Excellent |
- use of time |
Great! |
Questions:
1. What’s meaning of “oft-neglected” in slide 7?
Comments/Suggestions
Overall, it’s a nice and professional presentation. Dress up! The whole presentation was well organized. Need to pay more attention to the color using such as slide 20 and 26 |
Criteria:
1. Will the proposed research problem, if successfully carried out, be a significant contribution to this area of knowledge, deserving of an M.S. degree?
Yes. It’s a trend to use multimedia material in teaching.
2. Does the presentation give reasonable evidence that the student is familiar with significant literature in his/her field?
Yes. She showed various information of this field.
3. Are the proposed methods adequate to provide valid experimental data?
Yes. The methodology of this proposal explained very clearly.
4. Will the proposed experimental design provide valid data applicable to the proposed research problem?
Yes. It is clear and easy for the audiences to understand it.
5. Are the proposed statistical procedures adequate to provide valid interpretation of experimental data?
Yes. She will use factor analysis, correlation, and descriptive statistics to analyze the collected data.
6. Is the oral presentation clear and professional?
conciseness and clarity of the presentation |
It is an interesting topic. |
correct language |
Clear pronunciation but a little bit fast |
quality of the slides |
Abundant visual-aids. |
answering of the questions |
Good |
use of time |
3 minutes left |
Questions:
In slide # 25, you introduce the duration of research design, which was from 2009/2/18 to 2009/5/18. What does the duration mean?
Comments/Suggestion
It’s really a nice presentation, but if the speed of delivery is slower, it would be better.
1. Will the proposed research problem, if successfully carried out, be a significant contribution to this area of knowledge, deserving of an M.S. degree?
Yes. It’s a clear introduction in the background of this area (using multimedia material in teaching)
2. Does the presentation give reasonable evidence that the student is familiar with significant literature in his/her field?
Very clear introduction in the literature review. All the information was up dated.
3. Are the proposed methods adequate to provide valid experimental data?
I’m not sure. Crystal choose imovie to be the multimedia material in class to test whether it can increase student’s motivation, however there are many kinds of multimedia material you cannot just use one of the multimedia material and said using multimedia material in teaching will increase student’ motivation.
4. Will the proposed experimental design provide valid data applicable to the proposed research problem?
I’m not sure.
5. Are the proposed statistical procedures adequate to provide valid interpretation of experimental data?
I suggest that crystal could explain more about the procedures in her study. (In class how many different kinds of multimedia material did you use? What’s the course design? )
6. Is the oral presentation clear and professional?
- conciseness and clarity of the presentation |
Clear |
- correct language |
Clear |
- quality of the slides |
Very good, but the color is not clear in slide 20, 26 |
- answering of the questions |
Good |
- use of time |
Good |
Questions:
1. How many multimedia materials did you use in the class?
2. What’s your course design?
3. Do you think it is appropriate to use only one multimedia material in the study and you can answer RQ1?
Comments/Suggestions
Overall, it’s a nice and professional presentation. You showed great confidence. |

Criteria:
1. Will the proposed research problem, if successfully carried out, be a significant contribution to this area of knowledge, deserving of an M.S. degree?
Yes, in slide 9, 10, 11, the research questions she proposed showed significance of whether multimedia material affects EFL learner’s learning motivation.
2. Does the presentation give reasonable evidence that the student is familiar with significant literature in his/her field?
Yes, she divided three aspects and introduced individually in slide 15-19.
3. Are the proposed methods adequate to provide valid experimental data?
I think it is not appropriate enough because there is only one class as participants. There is no contrast group. How can we tell if students’ motivation is stimulated by this website instead of other variables?
4. Will the proposed experimental design provide valid data applicable to the proposed research problem?
I think yes because the questionnaire could provide information about students’ view point toward the website.
5. Are the proposed statistical procedures adequate to provide valid interpretation of experimental data?
Yes, she provided the validity clearly in slide 29-32.
6. Is the oral presentation clear and professional?
conciseness and clarity of the presentation |
good |
correct language |
good |
quality of the slides |
good |
answering of the questions |
good |
use of time |
good |
Questions:
In slide 21, uou mentioned that you will collect 7 evidences to show that zimmertwins is popular. Have you found the evidences?
Comments/Suggestions
Colorful PPT design Clear pronunciation Clear explanation |

To
- Will the proposed research problem, if successfully carried out, be a significant contribution to this area of knowledge, deserving of an M.S. degree?
A: Yes, the researcher clearly indicated an important issue for us. Also, this is an interesting topic. I believe it is worth for her to conduct this study.
- Does the presentation give reasonable evidence that the student is familiar with significant literature in his/her field?
A: Yes, the researcher provides a lot of new literature review in her study. We could understand her study in a short time.
- Are the proposed methods adequate to provide valid experimental data?
A: Yes, the methods that she used could provide valid experimental data for the study.
4. Will the proposed experimental design provide valid data applicable to the proposed research phere aren’t any control groups in this study. Therefore, I am afraid the result of the study would not be valid.
5. Are the proposed statistical procedures adequate to provide valid interpretation of experimental data?
A: Yes, the statistical procedures that she used could provide valid interpretation for the experimental data.
6. Is the oral presentation clear and professional?
conciseness and clarity of the presentation |
Good explanation |
correct language |
Good voice quality |
quality of the slides |
Clear and well organized |
answering of the questions |
Good handling |
use of time |
Well time control |
Questions:
You only use one class as your participant. Also, you don’t have any control group in this study. Do you think the result of the study will be valid.
Comments/Suggestions
l Familiar with the topic
l Good voice quality
l Very confident
l Dress up
Criteria:
1. Will the proposed research problem, if successfully carried out, be a significant contribution to this area of knowledge, deserving of an M.S. degree?
Yes, how to raise the learning motivation effectively to the students has became an issue.
2. Does the presentation give reasonable evidence that the student is familiar with significant literature in his/her field?
Yes, the literature are updated which pointed out the research questions.
3. Are the proposed methods adequate to provide valid experimental data?
Yes, the methods would provide valid data.
4. Will the proposed experimental design provide valid data applicable to the proposed research problem?
Yes, the research design is clear and definite.
5. Are the proposed statistical procedures adequate to provide valid interpretation of experimental data?
Yes, the procedures are adequate to provide valid results.
6. Is the oral presentation clear and professional?
- conciseness and clarity of the presentation
Fluently presentation.
- correct language
Good.
- quality of the slides
Professional and attractive.
- answering of the questions
Good.
- use of time
Good.
Questions:
Do you think the website is appropriate to the college students? There might be some students are not willing to use this “cute” website because of their age.
Comments/Suggestions
It is convenient to fill in the questionnaires on line. |

Dear Crystal,
Criteria:
1. Will the proposed research problem, if successfully carried out, be a significant contribution to this area of knowledge, deserving of an M.S. degree?
Yes. Nowadays, it is an e-world, multimedia material must be a need for the future teaching.
2. Does the presentation give reasonable evidence that the student is familiar with significant literature in his/her field?
Yes. From her well-prepared introduction and literature review, I can tell that she is familiar with significant literature in her field.
3. Are the proposed methods adequate to provide valid experimental data?
Yes. I think that 55 participants and the duration lasts 3 months will be adequate to provide valid experimental data.
4. Will the proposed experimental design provide valid data applicable to the proposed research problem?
Yes. She prepared 2 kinds of questionnaire to conduct the research and will interview the participants after the study.
5. Are the proposed statistical procedures adequate to provide valid interpretation of experimental data?
I am not sure because I am not good at statistics. However, I think she use SPSS to analyze the data and to examine the relationship is quite fine.
6. Is the oral presentation clear and professional?
Conciseness and clarity of the presentation- Good
Correct language- Good
Quality of the slides-
Wrong spelling of quantitative.
The month on slide 1 should be June.
Answering of the questions –Good
Use of time- Good
Questions:
1. According to your deeply understanding of multimedia, will you give your students other website to motivate their learning?
2. Why do you think i-movie is the best website to motivate students’ learning?
Comments/Suggestions
Time control well
Smooth presentation
Great online questionnaire design
Neat PPT

For Crystal
1. Will the proposed research problem, if successfully carried out, be a significant contribution to this area of knowledge, deserving of an M.S. degree?
Yes, the researcher combines the English teaching and technology in her further research. I think it will be the trend in the future and the research will be a significant contribution for the area of the language teaching.
2. Does the presentation give reasonable evidence that the student is familiar with significant literature in his/her field?
Because the researcher provides abundant data and information, I do believe that she is familiar with significant literature in her field.
3. Are the proposed methods adequate to provide valid experimental data?
Although there is only one experimental group in her research design, she gave good reason and certain theory to support the research design. I think the proposed methods adequate to provide valid experimental data.
4. Will the proposed experimental design provide valid data applicable to the proposed research problem?
Yes, the proposed experimental design provides valid data applicable to the proposed research problem.
5. Are the proposed statistical procedures adequate to provide valid interpretation of experimental data?
Yes, the proposed statistical design procedures are adequate to provide valid interpretation of experimental data.
6. Is the oral presentation clear and professional?
- conciseness and clarity of the presentation- good presentation
- correct language- clear and fluent
- answering of the questions- clear answer
- use of time- good control of time
Question
If you eliminate the questionnaire item with .52 reliability, will it affect the response of your research questions?
Comments
For me, there is too much information to get into the point. Overall, the researcher is well prepared and ready.
To my dear Sadia: | |
Questions |
What are the interview questions of the study? Furthermore, how will you analyze qualitative data fir your research? |
Sadia, I have attached the interview questions on the proposed final defense at the last page. I will first analyze the MSLQ questionnaire and then the check the interview questions to again verify my findings. | |
Comments and Suggestions |
Overall, this is an impressive presentation. I could see that you are so hard-working on your research. |
Thank you for your accomplishment. I appreciate of that! |
To my dear Irene: | |
Questions |
What’s meaning of “oft-neglected” in slide 7? |
This is the word that it shown on the paper. It means often-neglected. It is an Adj. and it means that it is the field that we are seldom focusing on it. | |
Comments and Suggestions |
Need to pay more attention to the color using such as slide 20 and 26 |
No problem! Thank you for your suggestions! ^0^ |
To my dear Jeffery: | |
Questions |
In slide # 25, you introduce the duration of research design, which was from 2009/2/18 to 2009/5/18. What does the duration mean? |
Duration means period. It means the experimental time is from 2009/2/18 to 2009/5/18. I will conduct this research in 3 months. | |
Comments and Suggestions |
It’s really a nice presentation, but if the speed of delivery is slower, it would be better. |
No problem! I will try to slow down my speed. (BUT, I am still slower than Jenny right?) ^^” |
To my dear Jeffery: | |
Questions |
In slide # 25, you introduce the duration of research design, which was from 2009/2/18 to 2009/5/18. What does the duration mean? |
Duration means period. It means the experimental time is from 2009/2/18 to 2009/5/18. I will conduct this research in 3 months. | |
Comments and Suggestions |
It’s really a nice presentation, but if the speed of delivery is slower, it would be better. |
No problem! I will try to slow down my speed. (BUT, I am not as faster as Jenny right?) ^^” |
To my dear Paulinna: | |
Questions |
1. How many multimedia materials did you use in the class? 2. What’s your course design? 3. Do you think it is appropriate to use only one multimedia material in the study and you can answer RQ1? |
1. Actually, we have 16 multimedia materials used in this class but Zimmer Twins are the main one that we do for each week. 2. Do you mean in slide 27? In week 1, I am going to introduce the Zimmer Twins website. In week 2, I will let them to familiar with the operation about this website. In week 3-8, we are going to create their won artificial. In week 9, we will ask the peers to leave the feedback to the peers. In week 10, we will ask the students to go back to check the feedback and revised them again. In week 11 and 12, we will ask students to add their won voice into their works. In the last week, 13, we will ask students to publish them on the YouTube to finish all this project. 3. On my research one, my research topic is that can multimedia material – “chosen website”…, it is limited in this chosen webiste. This is the case study in CYUT, and the case only can be used in this course and this material. It is an exploration. No one do this before. And it needs the follows to do it again and again to testify the result. | |
Answers from the audience |
4. Are the proposed methods adequate to provide valid experimental data? I’m not sure. Crystal choose imovie to be the multimedia material in class to test whether it can increase student’s motivation, however there are many kinds of multimedia material you cannot just use one of the multimedia material and said using multimedia material in teaching will increase student’ motivation. 5. Will the proposed experimental design provide valid data applicable to the proposed research problem? I’m not sure. 6. Are the proposed statistical procedures adequate to provide valid interpretation of experimental data? I suggest that crystal could explain more about the procedures in her study. (In class how many different kinds of multimedia material did you use? What’s the course design? ) |
Explain from the researcher |
4. Ok, thank you for your questions. Please let me explain for you. First, this is a case study, I am not talking about “ALL” multimedia material will increase student’s motivation. Please be noted that I said “multimedia material – chosen website” All my purpose is that I want to know whether the chosen website can arouse the learner’s learning motivation or not. If it successes, then it can offer e-teachers to have this tool to teach the students. On the other hand, if the website do not have the significant difference on motivation, the I can tell the e-teachers that the website is not suitable for e-learning. This is my research purpose in my field in the future. 5. I have asked the teachers and have read the books; they all said that if you want to test the relationship between 2 variables, you need to use correlation to know the degree of them. 6. I should explain more; however, because of time-limited, I need to skip them. And, actually, I have prepared many parts on methodology, I am worried that I will over time; therefore, I do not talk them in details. But, it’s very good for you to tell me this. I can understand that I should focus on this part more. Than you again, my dear Paulinna. |
Comments and Suggestions |
Overall, it’s a nice and professional presentation. You showed great confidence. |
Thank you for your accomplishment. I appreciate of that! |
To my dear Leya: | |
Questions |
In slide 21, you mentioned that you will collect 7 evidences to show that Zimmer Twins is popular. Have you found the evidences? |
After I finished the research, we will know the result. The 7 evidences are the way that I want to collect to prove the findings. But, it is necessary for us to finish all the experimental research to find out the result. | |
Answers from the audience |
Are the proposed methods adequate to provide valid experimental data? I think it is not appropriate enough because there is only one class as participants. There is no contrast group. How can we tell if students’ motivation is stimulated by this website instead of other variables? |
Explain from the researcher |
One group posttest only design is still one of the research method. Thought it is weak for it’s lacking of the control group; therefore, I am going to use 7 evidences to verify the result to solid my findings. |
Comments and Suggestions |
Colorful PPT design / Clear pronunciation / Clear explanation |
Thank you for your accomplishment. I appreciate of that! |
To my dear York: | |
Questions |
You only use one class as your participant. Also, you don’t have any control group in this study. Do you think the result of the study will be valid. |
Yes, if only use one group class to have control group in this study. It is not enough. So, I use 7 evidences to verify the result and try to make it valid. | |
Comments and Suggestions |
Familiar with the topic / Good voice quality / Very confident / Dress up |
Thank you for your accomplishment. I appreciate of that! |
To my dear Patty: | |
Questions |
Reply
Copyright 2010 Chaoyang University of Technology. All rights reserved. 台灣數位學習科技 建置 |