2013-05-15 09:35:52, Reply(15), Views(886), 2013-05-15 17:25:29) |
Strength |
1. Good pronunciation 2. You listed the 7 items. 3. You’re not nervous, are you? |
|
Weakness |
1. You could explain more about slide 16. 2. You should have put the notes to explain for those numbers. 3. You’re so calm, just give us more smiles. |
|
Questions |
Any limitation? What did you try to express by those pictures for us in slide 19 to slide 20? |
, 2013-05-16 21:29:12) Strength: First, you speak fluently and clearly. Second, you have body language with audiences. Third, you use your own words to explain the variables. Fourth, you control time well.
Weakness: Maybe you could show some examples of question for audiences.
Question: You don’t focus on the fashion brands, so what types of brand you could choose to conduct your study? Could you give me some examples?
, 2013-05-17 18:00:02) , 2013-05-17 19:40:53) For Laura,
1. S: Your presentation is fluent, speaking with suitable intonation and good pronunciation. The PPT is well-organized and concisely designed. For example, you use different colors to highlight independent and dependent variables, as well as keywords on slides 4, 5. 7, 8, 9, and 10. In particular, you illustrate the conceptual framework of this paper. The visual aids shown on the Methodology, Procedure, Fashion brands are very clear. You also mentioned Facebook as an example of Literature Review. The reflection part shows the connection between this paper and your future study. You also keep good eye contact with the audience.
2. I think your overall performance is good.
3. Question: On slide 18, the results of data analysis were shown. How did the authors get the conclusion from the results?
, 2013-05-17 20:31:27) , 2013-05-17 23:33:15) I love your design on framework slide (slide 11).
You use your own words to explain each slide.
You have plentiful posture.
Weakness:
You put the page number on different place.
Some words are small on handout.
Have more smile would be better.
Question:
On reflection part, you mentioned that you will focus on different kinds of brands, such as McDonalds.
So, will you adapt this questionnaire to do your future study?
, 2013-05-18 01:37:55) 
Neat PPT designNice gesture Use own word to present the paper
less eye-contactWords are too small and dark in slide 15some pronunciation should be improve (i.e. significant)
Why you choose undergraduate students to be your participants?, 2013-05-18 23:13:10) To 俊諺: Yes. We will use the same model.
To Betty: Smart phone has been studied a lot. I would love to study other products.
To Rady: Slide 19 and 20 show how brand image affects brand love and WOM.
To 旻燁: Maybe due to the different kind of brands the participant thought about.
To 庭欣: Myabe food related brand, for example coca cola.
To 沙賓: Yes I will take some parts of them.
To 俐君: Because young people like to eat fast food more, based on McDonald’s official report.
To 思竹: They got the result by using SEM.
To 佳潁: The sample is limited.
To 思廷: Yes, I am going to adapt it and add more items.
To 倪均: The undergraduate students are chosen because fast food is more popular among young consumers.
To 斐喻: Brand image could increase the emotional relationships with brands.
High-light points in your ppt.Your were use some gestures when you were present, that's good.Good ppt design, it's clearly.
You have a little eye-contact, but you should look at somebody's eye, not just look for a while.Your voice can have more powerful will be better.Some pronunciation sounds not too clearly.
How many participants are reliable in your future study, in your opinion?, 2013-05-20 22:06:25)