iLMS知識社群(Sites)師生部落格(Blogs)朝陽首頁(Homepage)TronClass教學平台Login
Research Writing & Publishing II---- Seminar-- 俊諺 Presentation I (04-22-2013)
by 徐碧霙 2013-04-24 22:46:48, Reply(21), Views(1855)
 
 
Reply(21)

Strength

1.          Pronunciation is improving.

2.          Parts of content are funny.

Weakness

1.          Citation needs appropriate spaces.

2.          Words are too close to the edge.

3.          Grammatical errors in Power point in s16 and 23.

4.          You should circle both of the numbers in s16 and 21 when comparing, not just one of the numbers. Then, it will be more clear.

Question

1.          What did you mean questionnaires are mother tongue you mentioned in presentation?

2.          Could you explain more about Additive and subadditive bilingualism?

3.          Any limitation?

Strength:
poised PPT

Weakness: 
1. wrong pronunciation "crucial"
2. speed up

Question:
If you conduct your research, how could you keep going when facing gender segregation situation?
Strength: 
pronunciation improved a lot
organized PPT

Weakness:
too slow when speaking, you should speed up!
no eye contact at all 
some typo errors 

Question:
What is baseline screen test?

Thanks for all viewers give some suggestion and comments

Although I prepared this article very early, I still have more

Improvements and unpredicted situation I need to cover it.  

To Rady

Q :  Any limitation?

The limitation is that there is potential researcher

( instructor ) bias.

Participants didn’t include males, the result just   

stand for females.

To TIM

Q : If you conduct your research, how could you keep going when facing gender segregation situation?

I will ask other school to build cooperation and do my best to control the variables may affect my research result.    

 

 

Voice loud enough.


Some words are too small.
More eye contact for the audience.
Speaking is not fluent than last time.


Q: Could you compare your study with this study?



Strengh: 1. You highlight some key words on slide 4.
              2. The result is very clear on slide 18.19.20.
          
Weakness: 1. The presentation is not very fluent.
                 2. More eye-contact is better.
                 3. Time control.
 
Question: Do you have any reflections about the research?
The delivery generally seems effective.
Topic selection and examples are interesting.
: PPT design is well organized. 

The delivery may appear inconsistent.
: APA format errors. 
: Eye contacts may be limited. 

: Did the author mention other reasons for communication breakdowns among EFL students?
  
Strength: Smile, PPT, P.10 (very creative), humble attitude
Weakness: Grammatical errors on PPT.
                 Please logically arrange your key points, "point by point ", on your PPT.
 
Question: Do you think the quantity of stuents and the gender of students influence the
               result of this research?
 ,
 
 
 
Strength:
1.Voice is loud enough.
2.PPT is colorful.
Weakness:
1.You really need to check your PPT carefully.
Question
Since t-test showed no statistically significant differences, what is your opinion?
Strength: 1. You highlight the key words on slide 4, 5, 16, 20 and 22.
                2. The procedure part on slide 16 and 17 are clear.
                3. Your voice is louder.
 
Weakness: 1. If you can more eye contact with audiences would be better.
                   2. You are a little not fluent.
                   3. If you can time control would be better.
 
Question: Did researcher mention why the participants are all female students?
Strength:
1. Your PPT design and pronunciation is better than before.
2. Your voice is loud enough.

Weakness:
1. You should have more eye contact with audience.
2. There are some errors and APA problems on your PPT, especially on Literature part.
3. Your topic is "Enhancing foreign language learning through listening strategies delivered in L1", but you said "in L2".

Question:
My question just like Anne mentioned, did the researcher mentioned that why there are only females? Any specific reason?

 Strength part: 

(1) You speak clearly.

(2)The last ppt slide is quite funny. 

(3) Voice is loud enough.

Weakness part:

(1)Too nervous

(2) You can give us more eye contact.

(3) Time controlling

Question:

Can you briefly introduce “post hoc” ?

TO Sabrina

Q : Could you compare your study with this study?

A : My study may focus on the active visual learning to improve student’s listening ability, and this study give me more aspects to

conduct my fulture research.

TO 佳穎

Q : Do you have any reflections about the research?

A : My reflection is that this study give an new way to improve student’s listening ability, also the country very special of their

participants( all were females )

 

TO 維真

Q : Did the author mention other reasons for communication breakdowns among EFL students?

A : No, but most study showed that most EFL country learner didn’t use L2 after class, because that language still not close for their own culture  

 TO 桂園

Q : Do you think the quantity of students and the gender of students influence the result of this research?

A : Sure! Because the country in this study, males and females were separated by government in their learning process.

TO Debbie

Q : Since t-test showed no statistically significant differences, what is your opinion?

A : I think there has not exactly correct or positive result, maybe there has some variables to interfere the result.  

TO 俐君

Q : Did researcher mention why the participants are all female students?

A : Because this country is in Iran, so males and females can’t not learning together.

 

 

 

 

TO Ivy

Q : Can you briefly introduce “post hoc” ?

A : Post hoc in Chinese is “事後多重比較”. It means after the result appeared, researcher compared with variables and try to found variation.

TO Patty

Q : What is baseline screen test?

A : The test from the locational language center in Iran, and the test is to test student’s language level.

 

For Rickie:

1. S: Your presentation is fluent. Time control is good. The PPT is well-structured and clearly presented, divided into Introduction, Literature Review, Methodology, Result & Conclusion, and Limitation. Visual aids are used to impress the audience, for example, Title page, slides 5, 6, and 10. The picture on slide 10 is interesting.

2. The format on Citation page did not conform with APA rule. For example, the title of the paper should be upper-lower case. There must be a blank after a comma or period.

3. Question: Are the questions used in the pretest and posttest the same?

 The voice was loud enough.
ppt's structure was clearly enough.

some errors in your ppt.
not enough eye-contact.
bad time controlled and not fluently speech.

What is the correlation between your future thesis and this study?
Strength: Your methodology part is quite clear.
               
Weakness: more eye contact with audiences.
                  more practice your presentation.
                  have some grammar mistakes.
Question: Are you use the same questionnaire in your research? 
Strength: First, you highlight the key words that we can understand clearly like slide 4 and 5. Second, your voice is loud enough. Third, your pronunciation improve a lot.  
               
Weakness: First, you could more eye contact with audiences. Second, some PPT's words are vague  in the handout like slide 7 and 8. Third, you could notice the grammar in your PPT.
                
Question: Could you use the post hoc in your study? 
Strength - Spoke clearly and improved a lot.

Weakness - Did not dressed up, nervous and time control.

Question - What is your reflections about this paper?
High light the point
fluent speech
Neat PPT

 too many words in Introduction
 should dress up
 no eye-contact

 In your opinion, is there any weakness in this kind of instruction?
Prev12Next
Reply