2013-03-21 21:25:25, Reply(17), Views(791), 2013-03-21 22:07:08) , 2013-03-21 23:34:38) 
:The delivery is natural and confident : The way the presenter shows audience Meth and result is really well.: Bonus for PPT designed in slide 13 and 20~25 
: Need more smile.: Time control. : Effective use of gesture may not be consistent. 
speak fluently show confident nice suit
over time wrong title on slide 27 it'll be better to be more familiar with the method part. , 2013-03-22 07:59:18) |
Strength |
1. Fluent 2. Strong atmosphere 3. Confidence |
|
Weakness |
1. Incorrect date 2. List the questions on slides would be better 3. Wrong topic in slide 13 4. No smile again |
|
Questions |
What are the distinctions in step 1 to 3 in procedure? In slide 14, if so, highlighting the differences in slide 21 to 23 would be better. |
, 2013-03-22 19:40:42) ☞ Strength part:
(1) You speak clear, loud and fluently.
(2)Your pronunciation is quite good.
(3) Show the confident! GOOD~
☞Weakness part:
(1) You can give us more eye contact.
(2) Smile J ! You are a little bit serious.
☞Question:
Does the author do the pilot study?
, 2013-03-22 21:28:03) Strength: First, you speak powerful. Second, you show the results of hypotheses clearly. Third, the PPT is designed clear on slide 20 to 24.
Weakness: First, the time should be controlled. Second, the PPT’s words are covered on slide 5.
Question: Do you think the m-learning and e-learning have the disadvantages for teaching?
, 2013-03-22 21:59:34) , 2013-03-22 22:05:54) 2. Reading through all the hypotheses listed from slides 29 to 34 is a little lengthy. The elapsed time could be made shorter by condensing it into a compact form.
Powerful voice.Good ppt design, and also clearly, it's very professional.Your explanation was clearly.
You can have more smile that will be better.Even though your study was too much, but you still have to take note of time controlled. You didn't answer all the questions that listeners asked.
Does the researcher have pilot study?, 2013-03-23 00:02:23) , 2013-03-23 00:41:53) , 2013-03-23 00:50:23) , 2013-03-24 22:00:26) Rickie: The strategies is using mobile phone to catch students’ attention, that’s why I want to use this kind of teaching method.
Larua: I think the students’ talent of learning language would affect the result.
Patty: I’ve already rechecked the paper, I am pretty sure that the authors didn’t mention how the test developed, that’s absolutely a limitation of this study.
Betty: The only distinction is their learning materials. Experimental group used PDA phone always and control group used printed materials and audio CDs.
Anne: HELLO sever station is only a system of ubiquitous game. The system provides various games to catch student’s attention and make their learning motivation higher so that they can focus on the learning progress.
Ivy & Apple: No, the authors didn’t mention that they did the pilot study.
Amber: M-learning needs mobile phones, and I don’t think that every student can afford that to be their learning materials. E-learning focus on computer operating, I’m afraid that students’ handwriting skill would get worse.
Jessica: I can not be sure, I want to search more popular and standard station to choose what I really want to do!
Scott & Sabrina: I’m sorry that the authors didn’t focus on participants’ part, the authors didn’t mention about participants in detail L
Tim: The phone would be locked that students can only play games I apply, and they have to do a test after each class.
Debbie: The statistical method authors used is one-way ANOVA.
Adam: I’m still thinking about it, because I just want to do the pre-test and post-test.
Sharon: Responses to all questions were on a five point Likert-scale, from 5 for “strongly agree” to 1 for “strongly disagree.” The Cronbach's alpha for each sub-scale was 0.86, 0.87, 0.86, and 0.90, respectively, and for the survey was 0.91. These alpha coefficients exceeded 0.85, which confirmed the internal consistency of the survey.